Re: Update the remaining SYSCTL_INT_READONLY cases

2021-05-01 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
> On 1 May 2021, at 19:08, Greg Steuck wrote: > > Vitaliy Makkoveev writes: > >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:14:31PM -0700, Greg Steuck wrote: >> Hi, you missing KERN_SYSVMSG, KERN_SYSVSEM, KERN_SYSVSHM variables. The >> rest diff is ok by me. > > Good catch. My search/replace pattern

Re: Update the remaining SYSCTL_INT_READONLY cases

2021-05-01 Thread Greg Steuck
Vitaliy Makkoveev writes: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:14:31PM -0700, Greg Steuck wrote: > Hi, you missing KERN_SYSVMSG, KERN_SYSVSEM, KERN_SYSVSHM variables. The > rest diff is ok by me. Good catch. My search/replace pattern wasn't good enough. Fixed and will commit. >> >> Unused, maybe

Re: Update the remaining SYSCTL_INT_READONLY cases

2021-05-01 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
;> > > > > Or introduce this with the separate diff which will convert all related > > structures? > > I failed to find a case where to use SYSCTL_INT_UNBOUNDED. We always > find better "common sense" limits than completely unconstrained. > I guess it could be

Update the remaining SYSCTL_INT_READONLY cases

2021-04-30 Thread Greg Steuck
> > Or introduce this with the separate diff which will convert all related > structures? I failed to find a case where to use SYSCTL_INT_UNBOUNDED. We always find better "common sense" limits than completely unconstrained. >From 691cf8f4635f22593fe8319055da7aa340a8164b Mon