I noticed that some of the loops over all AID (address identifiers) start
at 0 but they should use AID_MIN. This is not a general rule and I
actually skipped one of the for loops because I think there 0 is actually
better. In the cases I fixed it is known that only known AID and not
AID_UNSPEC are
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 05:04:05PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I noticed that some of the loops over all AID (address identifiers) start
> at 0 but they should use AID_MIN. This is not a general rule and I
> actually skipped one of the for loops because I think there 0 is actually
> better. In th
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 05:15:49PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 05:04:05PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > I noticed that some of the loops over all AID (address identifiers) start
> > at 0 but they should use AID_MIN. This is not a general rule and I
> > actually skipped on
