Claudio Jeker [cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com] wrote:
>
> Are you sure that problem still exists in 4.8 or -current? Because the way
> networks are handled changed completely. There is no longer a special
> static/connected global rule. Now explicit rules have a higher precedence
> then the dynamic "net
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Rod Whitworth [glis...@witworx.com] wrote:
> > I'm looking after a bgpd setup which announces an IPv6 /32 and an IPv4
> > /21.
> >
> > Due to a need for some heavy traffic clients to have their traffic
> > arrive via just one trans
Rod Whitworth [glis...@witworx.com] wrote:
> I'm looking after a bgpd setup which announces an IPv6 /32 and an IPv4
> /21.
>
> Due to a need for some heavy traffic clients to have their traffic
> arrive via just one transit I'd like to turn that /21 into a /22 and
> two /23s and only advertise one
I'm looking after a bgpd setup which announces an IPv6 /32 and an IPv4
/21.
Due to a need for some heavy traffic clients to have their traffic
arrive via just one transit I'd like to turn that /21 into a /22 and
two /23s and only advertise one of the /23s via the "heavy traffic"
transit.
I'm on s
