Makes sense. Some strange CMUism.
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> This type is just another way to write 'vaddr_t' and requires pulling a
> ddb-specific MD header for that, can't we just use vaddr_t everywhere?
>
> Diff below does the conversion in sys/kern and sys/ddb, ok?
>
> Index: kern/kern_tim
This type is just another way to write 'vaddr_t' and requires pulling a
ddb-specific MD header for that, can't we just use vaddr_t everywhere?
Diff below does the conversion in sys/kern and sys/ddb, ok?
Index: kern/kern_timeout.c
===
