On Sun, August 9, 2015 11:24 pm, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> If you're asking for sudo's -i option, sorry, we're out of option
> space in doas. sudo is over there --> ports
>
>
> Philip Guenther
>
That's fair. It's easy enough to work around.
Tim.
[I really do need a gmail extension to unbind control-return]
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, trondd wrote:
>> Was it a choice to not have 'doas -s' launch the shell as a login shell?
That's what sudo -s does, yes?
If you're asking for s
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, trondd wrote:
> Was it a choice to not have 'doas -s' launch the shell as a login shell?
> Doing so reloads profiles preserving aliases and prompt variables.
>
> If a user is allowed to run the shell, the user can source the profile
> anyway, so this is just a con
Was it a choice to not have 'doas -s' launch the shell as a login shell?
Doing so reloads profiles preserving aliases and prompt variables.
If a user is allowed to run the shell, the user can source the profile
anyway, so this is just a convenience. Is there a security risk I'm
missing?
Ti
