Re: dt(4) for hppa & alpha

2020-01-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
Mark Kettenis wrote: > Theo de Raadt schreef op 2020-01-22 23:20: > > this is not actually surprising. there are only about 3 majors > > which can't > > move around without problem. It is a MD detail, which is why tables > > have > > to know about it > > > > ok > > I sometimes wish we'd split

Re: dt(4) for hppa & alpha

2020-01-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
Theo de Raadt schreef op 2020-01-22 23:20: this is not actually surprising. there are only about 3 majors which can't move around without problem. It is a MD detail, which is why tables have to know about it ok I sometimes wish we'd split the majors into MI and MD "ranges", but that'd nee

Re: dt(4) for hppa & alpha

2020-01-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
this is not actually surprising. there are only about 3 majors which can't move around without problem. It is a MD detail, which is why tables have to know about it ok Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Major 30 is taken on both platforms, so use 32 to give a chance for > people to use dt(4) and btrac

dt(4) for hppa & alpha

2020-01-22 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Major 30 is taken on both platforms, so use 32 to give a chance for people to use dt(4) and btrace(8) on these platforms. Ok? === RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/etc.alpha/MAKEDEV.md,v retrieving revision 1.72 diff -u -p -r1.72 MAKEDEV.md ---