On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:46:17PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:07:51 +0100
> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 04:55:59PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > The diff below contains a couple of improvements to dwiic(4). They're
> > > mostly for mak
> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:07:51 +0100
> From: Claudio Jeker
>
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 04:55:59PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The diff below contains a couple of improvements to dwiic(4). They're
> > mostly for making ipmi(4) on the Ampere/Lenovo arm64 boxes work
> > better. But they nee
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 04:55:59PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below contains a couple of improvements to dwiic(4). They're
> mostly for making ipmi(4) on the Ampere/Lenovo arm64 boxes work
> better. But they need testing on x86 machines with
> keyboards.touchpads/touchscreens connecte
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:55:59 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> The diff below contains a couple of improvements to dwiic(4). They're
> mostly for making ipmi(4) on the Ampere/Lenovo arm64 boxes work
> better. But they need testing on x86 machines with
> keyboards.touchpads/touchscreens
The diff below contains a couple of improvements to dwiic(4). They're
mostly for making ipmi(4) on the Ampere/Lenovo arm64 boxes work
better. But they need testing on x86 machines with
keyboards.touchpads/touchscreens connected over i2c.
Most of the diff is there to properly implement SMBus bloc
