don't see any harm in this, ok nicm
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:44:52PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:10:35PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> >
> > Makes sense to me, ok.
> >
> > Later we should fix the include orderning and change the warning
> > printfs to stde
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:10:35PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
>
> Makes sense to me, ok.
>
> Later we should fix the include orderning and change the warning
> printfs to stderr.
Yes. Well, here is the first phase.
* As haesbaert suggests, correctly order include files.
* Found so
fine, ok nicm
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 07:22:07AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > All but the stat bit looks fine. How do you reproduce the problems? It
> > seems to fail just fine without it.
> >
> > $ config -f /x
>
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 07:22:07AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> All but the stat bit looks fine. How do you reproduce the problems? It
> seems to fail just fine without it.
>
> $ config -f /x
> config: cannot read /x: No such file or directory
To reproduce these, you would use -e.
I
Hi
All but the stat bit looks fine. How do you reproduce the problems? It
seems to fail just fine without it.
$ config -f /x
config: cannot read /x: No such file or directory
Also maybe use access(2) instead?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:37:34AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Evening,
>
> When usi
Makes sense to me, ok.
Later we should fix the include orderning and change the warning
printfs to stderr.
Can we get another ok ?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:37:34AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Evening,
>
> When using `config -e`:
> * Don't print a NULL pointer if binary loaded is not a kerne
Evening,
When using `config -e`:
* Don't print a NULL pointer if binary loaded is not a kernel.
* Don't segfault of binary loaded is not a kernel.
* Report non-existent kernel via a preliminary stat().
* Make a warning look like the rest.
OK?
Index: exec.c
==
