On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 07:00:00PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:43:28PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > xhci's calculation of 'xfer->actlen' is wrong if the xfer was split into
> > > mul
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:43:28PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > xhci's calculation of 'xfer->actlen' is wrong if the xfer was split into
> > multiple TRBs. That's because the code just looks at the remainder
> > reporte
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> xhci's calculation of 'xfer->actlen' is wrong if the xfer was split into
> multiple TRBs. That's because the code just looks at the remainder
> reported by the status TRB. However, this remainder only refers to the
> total siz
Hi,
xhci's calculation of 'xfer->actlen' is wrong if the xfer was split into
multiple TRBs. That's because the code just looks at the remainder
reported by the status TRB. However, this remainder only refers to the
total size of this single TRB; not to the total size of the xfer.
Example: assume
