Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-20 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat > important that this works right. And

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-16 Thread Mike Larkin
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:15:39PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > > reponsible for detecting panels

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-15 Thread Paul Irofti
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat > important that this works right.

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-15 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Mark Kettenis(mark.kette...@xs4all.nl) on 2018.01.15 01:02:58 +0100: > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat > important that this works

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-15 Thread Florian Obser
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat > important that this works right.

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-15 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hi, * Benjamin Baier wrote: > > Thinkpad X220 here, with an external monitor(HDMI) connected throught > a docking station. > The external monitor is now working on the first boot, before I had > to do one suspend/resume cycle to get it recognized, great. Also a Thinkpad X220 and I can confirm

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-15 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 01:02:58 +0100 (CET) > So I'm looking for testers. I'm especially interested in tests of > external displays on all sorts of connector types (VGA, DVI, HDMI, > DP). It would be really great to get some tests on older stuff with > (S)DVO. Please let me know if there are

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-15 Thread Benjamin Baier
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 01:02:58 +0100 (CET) Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat > important

Re: inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-14 Thread Mike Larkin
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is > reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat > important that this works right.

inteldrm(4) tests needed

2018-01-14 Thread Mark Kettenis
The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat important that this works right. And the Linux code developed some quirks over the years that my rewrite