On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
> important that this works right. And
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:15:39PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> > transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> > reponsible for detecting panels
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
> important that this works right.
Mark Kettenis(mark.kette...@xs4all.nl) on 2018.01.15 01:02:58 +0100:
> The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
> important that this works
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
> important that this works right.
Hi,
* Benjamin Baier wrote:
>
> Thinkpad X220 here, with an external monitor(HDMI) connected throught
> a docking station.
> The external monitor is now working on the first boot, before I had
> to do one suspend/resume cycle to get it recognized, great.
Also a Thinkpad X220 and I can confirm
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 01:02:58 +0100 (CET)
> So I'm looking for testers. I'm especially interested in tests of
> external displays on all sorts of connector types (VGA, DVI, HDMI,
> DP). It would be really great to get some tests on older stuff with
> (S)DVO. Please let me know if there are
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 01:02:58 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
> important
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
> transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
> reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
> important that this works right.
The diff below adopts more of the Linux code to manage i2c
transactions on hardware supported by inteldrm(4). The i2c stuff is
reponsible for detecting panels and monitors, so it is somewhat
important that this works right. And the Linux code developed some
quirks over the years that my rewrite
10 matches
Mail list logo