> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 19:35:42 +0200
> From: Klemens Nanni
Please go ahead.
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:43:23AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > I realuze that eeprom(8) calls these fields, but they're usually just
> > > called variables.
> >
> > makes sense.
> Su
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:43:23AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > I realuze that eeprom(8) calls these fields, but they're usually just
> > called variables.
>
> makes sense.
Sure, let's call them variables here.
> > Also, it is strange to have the ldom.conf in the usr.sb
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:59:37 +0200
> > From: Klemens Nanni
> >
> > Point users to the manual describing "auto-boot?" and the like.
> >
> > Feedback? OK?
>
> I realuze that eeprom(8) calls these fields, but they're usually just
> called variables.
makes sense.
> A
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:59:37 +0200
> From: Klemens Nanni
>
> Point users to the manual describing "auto-boot?" and the like.
>
> Feedback? OK?
I realuze that eeprom(8) calls these fields, but they're usually just
called variables.
Also, it is strange to have the ldom.conf in the usr.sbin/
Point users to the manual describing "auto-boot?" and the like.
Feedback? OK?
Index: ldom.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ldomd/ldom.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 ldom.conf.5
--- ldom.conf.5 27 Jul 2019 09:
