On 20 Aug 2014, at 9:54 am, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote:
this lets you have networks on the native vlan on an interface
at 1500, while setting a child vlan interfaces mtu to jumbos.
ok?
how about now?
i believe both ix and oce unconditionally set their mru now, and it's the
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:11:14PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On 20/08/14 8:03 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that still
interpret the configured mtu as a what the
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:11:14PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On 20/08/14 8:03 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that still
interpret the configured mtu as a what the
On 27 August 2014 13:17, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:11:14PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On 20/08/14 8:03 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some
On 27 August 2014 13:23, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:11:14PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On 20/08/14 8:03 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some
On 20/08/14 8:03 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that still
interpret the configured mtu as a what the mru should be.
dlg
oce(4) and ix(4) need to be fixed.
--
On 2014/08/20 17:17, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
David Gwynne [da...@gwynne.id.au] wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that
still interpret the configured mtu as a what the mru should
Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
On 2014/08/20 17:17, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
David Gwynne [da...@gwynne.id.au] wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that
still
On 2014/08/21 08:45, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
On 2014/08/20 17:17, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
David Gwynne [da...@gwynne.id.au] wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max
Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
On 2014/08/21 08:45, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
On 2014/08/20 17:17, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
David Gwynne [da...@gwynne.id.au] wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our
ok chris@
David Gwynne [da...@gwynne.id.au] wrote:
this lets you have networks on the native vlan on an interface
at 1500, while setting a child vlan interfaces mtu to jumbos.
ok?
Index: if_vlan.c
===
RCS file:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that still
interpret the configured mtu as a what the mru should be.
dlg
On 21 Aug 2014, at 6:29, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
ok chris@
David Gwynne [da...@gwynne.id.au] wrote:
sthen@ says this is likely a bit optimistic. while most of our drivers
unconditionally configure their max mru, there's some stupid ones that still
interpret the configured mtu as a what the mru should be.
All the more reason to make this change,
this lets you have networks on the native vlan on an interface
at 1500, while setting a child vlan interfaces mtu to jumbos.
ok?
Index: if_vlan.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c,v
retrieving revision 1.108
diff -u -p
14 matches
Mail list logo
