Re: lorder(1) - don't rely on sort(1) and join(1) historical behavior

j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: When I looked at the lorder script, I had trouble understanding the sort and join calls, since the syntax used is historical. I'm using this diff since a couple of months. Could someone double check that I got the conversion right? Is

lorder(1) - don't rely on sort(1) and join(1) historical behavior

When I looked at the lorder script, I had trouble understanding the sort and join calls, since the syntax used is historical. I'm using this diff since a couple of months. Could someone double check that I got the conversion right? Index: lorder.sh