> On 14 Nov 2017, at 23:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On 14/11/17(Tue) 14:42, David Gwynne wrote:
>> this replaces the single mbuf_queue and task in struct ifnet with
>> a new ifiqueue structure modelled on ifqueues.
>
> The name is confusing, should we rename ifqueues 'ifoqueue' then?
yes.
On 14/11/17(Tue) 14:42, David Gwynne wrote:
> this replaces the single mbuf_queue and task in struct ifnet with
> a new ifiqueue structure modelled on ifqueues.
The name is confusing, should we rename ifqueues 'ifoqueue' then?
> the main motivation behind this was to show mpsafe input counters.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:42:30PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> this replaces the single mbuf_queue and task in struct ifnet with
> a new ifiqueue structure modelled on ifqueues.
>
> the main motivation behind this was to show mpsafe input counters.
>
> ifiqueues, like ifqueues, allow a driver to
On 14.11.2017. 5:42, David Gwynne wrote:
> this replaces the single mbuf_queue and task in struct ifnet with
> a new ifiqueue structure modelled on ifqueues.
i've tested this diff with ix, myx, em and bge with down/up interfaces
and everything is working fine ...
this replaces the single mbuf_queue and task in struct ifnet with
a new ifiqueue structure modelled on ifqueues.
the main motivation behind this was to show mpsafe input counters.
ifiqueues, like ifqueues, allow a driver to configure multiple
queueus. this in turn allows a driver with multiple rx
