Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> You may notice pagezero uses rep. Background page zeroing was removed
> quite some time ago. I see OpenBSD still has it, but it is most likely
> detrimental by now. If it is to be kept, a pagezero variant utilizing
> non-temporal stores still makes sense but a different
> From: Mateusz Guzik
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 15:29:39 +0100
>
> On 3/18/19, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> > Hi tech@,
> >
> > Now that efifb(4) supports remapping the framebuffer in write combining
> > mode, it's on par with inteldrm regarding display performance as for as
> > rasops(9) is
On 3/18/19, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> Now that efifb(4) supports remapping the framebuffer in write combining
> mode, it's on par with inteldrm regarding display performance as for as
> rasops(9) is concerned.
>
> Therefore, I'm proposing reverting changes which were introduced in
>
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:49:48 +0100
> From: Frederic Cambus
>
> Hi tech@,
>
> Now that efifb(4) supports remapping the framebuffer in write combining
> mode, it's on par with inteldrm regarding display performance as for as
> rasops(9) is concerned.
>
> Therefore, I'm proposing reverting
Hi tech@,
Now that efifb(4) supports remapping the framebuffer in write combining
mode, it's on par with inteldrm regarding display performance as for as
rasops(9) is concerned.
Therefore, I'm proposing reverting changes which were introduced in
rasops32_putchar() in revision 1.8 [1] as they are
