Hi!
If you http PUT a "big" file through relayd, server<>relay read side
will eventually get a EVBUFFER_TIMEOUT. Nothing comes back from the
server until the PUT is done. I disabled server read timeouts for PUT
requests.
While trying to fix the issue I managed to trigger another problem. For
HTTP
Hi!
Without text mangling this time...
Rivo
Index: usr.sbin/relayd/relay.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/relay.c,v
retrieving revision 1.236
diff -u -p -r1.236 relay.c
--- usr.sbin/relayd/relay.c 28 Nov 2017 01:51:47 -0
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:25:39AM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If you http PUT a "big" file through relayd, server<>relay read side
> will eventually get a EVBUFFER_TIMEOUT. Nothing comes back from the
> server until the PUT is done. I disabled server read timeouts for PUT
> requests.
>
>
Hi!
Thanks for enlightening me, I’ll try to fix the real problem.
Rivo
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 08:42, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:25:39AM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> If you http PUT a "big" file through relayd, server<>relay read side
>> will eventually get a
Hi!
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 07:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I have seen something similar and came to the conclusion that the
> timeout
> handling of relayd is not correct. As long as traffic is flowing the
> timeout should be reset (at least that is what every other
> implementation
> does). Th
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:42:03AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:25:39AM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> > If you http PUT a "big" file through relayd, server<>relay read side
> > will eventually get a EVBUFFER_TIMEOUT. Nothing comes back from the
> > server until the PUT is
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 00:12 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:42:03AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:25:39AM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> > > If you http PUT a "big" file through relayd, server<>relay read
> > > side
> > > will eventually get a EV
Hi!
Please ingore this.
Rivo
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 14:01 +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 00:12 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:42:03AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:25:39AM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> > > > If you http
Hi!
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 00:12 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I have commited more regression tests that check the timeout with
> unidirectional traffic flow. I could not find an error. In theory
> when we have an idle timeout in one direction, relayd checks wheter
> there is trafic flowing in
