> I don't think the entry is pointless. There are setups where nexthop of
> different address family do make sense. Things like rfc5549 can do
> IPv4 over IPv6 Core. In some cases this is used for network autodiscovery
> (using IPv6 link-local addresses as nexthops).
I didn't understand them.
As
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 03:58:23PM +0900, morimoto wrote:
> hi,
> I found an interesting issue while toying routing.
> route(1) accepts IPv4 destination and IPv6 gateway entry.
> command is as below:
> route add 192.0.2.1 2001:db8::1
>
> Curiously it has no error.
> The entry is pointless, I
hi,
I found an interesting issue while toying routing.
route(1) accepts IPv4 destination and IPv6 gateway entry.
command is as below:
route add 192.0.2.1 2001:db8::1
Curiously it has no error.
The entry is pointless, I think it should teach a mistake.
If destination and gateway address family
