On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 01:45:19PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> Thanks Claudio,
>
> A question about stats below
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > @@ -1246,8 +1249,8 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > logx("Certificate revocation lists: %zu",
Thanks Claudio,
A question about stats below
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> @@ -1246,8 +1249,8 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> logx("Certificate revocation lists: %zu", stats.crls);
> logx("Ghostbuster records: %zu", stats.gbrs);
>
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:51:33PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:05:57PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > This diff adds a new cache subdir called "valid". This is the place where
> > > all verified and
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:51:33PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:05:57PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This diff adds a new cache subdir called "valid". This is the place where
> > all verified and good files are stored after a run. It makes -n work a lot
> > better
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:05:57PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff adds a new cache subdir called "valid". This is the place where
> all verified and good files are stored after a run. It makes -n work a lot
> better since -n will now only look at what's inside "valid" and ignore
> "rsync"
This diff adds a new cache subdir called "valid". This is the place where
all verified and good files are stored after a run. It makes -n work a lot
better since -n will now only look at what's inside "valid" and ignore
"rsync" and "rrdp".
The trust anchors are still stored in "ta" even if valid.
