On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:15:54PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > I will commit this version in a bit (once rpki-client finished its run).
>
> I like this approach a lot better. ok
>
> One small comment below.
>
> > --
> > :wq Claudio
> >
> > Index: parser.c
> > ===
> I will commit this version in a bit (once rpki-client finished its run).
I like this approach a lot better. ok
One small comment below.
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> Index: parser.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/parse
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:46:35PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:38:46PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This is a follow up to the valid_x509() commit form earlier today.
> > tb@ suggested that the crl check should be grouped together.
> > After some thought I decided to
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:38:46PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This is a follow up to the valid_x509() commit form earlier today.
> tb@ suggested that the crl check should be grouped together.
> After some thought I decided to do this all different.
> First of all introduce a checkcrl flag which
This is a follow up to the valid_x509() commit form earlier today.
tb@ suggested that the crl check should be grouped together.
After some thought I decided to do this all different.
First of all introduce a checkcrl flag which turns on
X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK. This prevents code that expects a CRL t
