On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its hind
quarters but will compile and run code having those
functions..which is better?
Best for what?
best for the particular example I gave. There are others,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:10:05 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Ralph Siegler wrote:
Well, starting with r1.54 [0], stdlib.h never declares getopt().
However, I think the conversation could continue in spite of that.
I would expect motivation to be aggregated cost in the
On 12 April 2014 10:47, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its hind
quarters but will compile and run code having those
functions..which is better?
Best for
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:36:56 -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
On 12 April 2014 10:47, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its
hind quarters but will compile and
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
...
So, let's see you successfully submit patches to *remove* those
non-2008.1 features and backwards compatibilities to .1 and even before,
and fix the collateral damage to the distro that the minus diffs cause.
I
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:17:24 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was looking through some OpenBSD code and noticed that rs and jot
are both missing #include unistd.h
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:17:24 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was looking through some
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:03 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:03 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014
Well, starting with r1.54 [0], stdlib.h never declares getopt().
However, I think the conversation could continue in spite of that.
I would expect motivation to be aggregated cost in the form:
* a significant amount of patched ports;
* a significant amount of affected port prospects;
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Ralph Siegler wrote:
Well, starting with r1.54 [0], stdlib.h never declares getopt().
However, I think the conversation could continue in spite of that.
I would expect motivation to be aggregated cost in the form:
* a significant amount of patched ports;
* a
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Ralph Siegler wrote:
Well Philip, had we mentioned any POSIX 2008.1 certified or compliant OS
in this thread that would be an interesting point to bring up. But
neither GNU/Linux, OpenBSD, nor FreeBSD is fully compliant.
On the other hand, Mac OSX Mavericks is 100%
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:17:24 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
I was looking through some OpenBSD code and noticed that rs and jot are
both missing #include unistd.h even though they use getopt. It seems
that stdlib.h defines getopt on OpenBSD. However, this is not the
correct header
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:17:24 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was looking through some OpenBSD code and noticed that rs and jot are
both missing #include unistd.h even though they use getopt. It seems
that stdlib.h defines
Hey all,
I was looking through some OpenBSD code and noticed that rs and jot
are both missing #include unistd.h even though they use getopt. It
seems that stdlib.h defines getopt on OpenBSD. However, this is not
the correct header file, and it makes it not possible to compile
OpenBSD's
15 matches
Mail list logo
