On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 08:11:12PM -0900, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Based on the fts_open(3) manpage and other base source usage, shouldn't
> this use fts_accpath instead of fts_name?
Yes this should use fts_accpath. I knew there was something different
than fts_name. I just missed it when I read
Based on the fts_open(3) manpage and other base source usage, shouldn't
this use fts_accpath instead of fts_name?
The use of fts_statp in this code seems a bit loose vs ftp_info: instead of
using S_ISLNK() on fts_statp I would expect this code to check for fts_info
== FTS_SL: according the
Hit this today while doing some tests. symlink_read() needs to use just
the filename and not the full path because fts_read(3) does chdir
internally.
Without this I got:
openrsync: error: ./obj/openrsync.1: readlink: No such file or directory
openrsync: error: symlink_read
openrsync: error:
