> On 14 Apr 2020, at 8:15 pm, Remi Locherer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:49:32PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Apr 2020, at 19:03, Remi Locherer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently looked into NHRP (RFC 2332) and noticed that our tcpdump does
>>> not have a
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:49:32PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
> > On 13 Apr 2020, at 19:03, Remi Locherer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently looked into NHRP (RFC 2332) and noticed that our tcpdump does
> > not have a printer for it. So I added support for NHRP to tcpdump.
> >
> >
> On 13 Apr 2020, at 19:03, Remi Locherer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently looked into NHRP (RFC 2332) and noticed that our tcpdump does
> not have a printer for it. So I added support for NHRP to tcpdump.
>
> Initially I was surprised: I expected a simpler protocol! But it is from
> the 90's
Hi,
I recently looked into NHRP (RFC 2332) and noticed that our tcpdump does
not have a printer for it. So I added support for NHRP to tcpdump.
Initially I was surprised: I expected a simpler protocol! But it is from
the 90's with all the protocols from then in mind (frame relay, ATM, ...).
I
