Hello,
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:45:31PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 27/05/17(Sat) 17:33, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > The global list of softc is *not* accessed in the input path, so it
> > > doesn't
On 27/05/17(Sat) 17:33, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > The global list of softc is *not* accessed in the input path, so it
> > doesn't need splnet().
> >
> > ioctl(2) handlers are already executed with the NET_LOCK() he
Hello,
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The global list of softc is *not* accessed in the input path, so it
> doesn't need splnet().
>
> ioctl(2) handlers are already executed with the NET_LOCK() held, so
> splnet() is superfluous.
changes look good to me, but s
The global list of softc is *not* accessed in the input path, so it
doesn't need splnet().
ioctl(2) handlers are already executed with the NET_LOCK() held, so
splnet() is superfluous.
ok?
Index: net/if_trunk.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src