Hello,
I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
2. Diff is attached.
According to the (informational) RFC 4890 this kind of icmp6 message
must not be dropped for the correct functioning of IPv6. Is there a key
word planned for this icmp6 code which could be used
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
> 2. Diff is attached.
>
i've looked at the rfc, and {net,free}bsd man pages, and am clueless.
would any other developer like to comment on this
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:27:31AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
> > 2. Diff is attached.
> >
>
> i've looked at the rfc, and {net,free}b
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:27:31AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
>> > 2. Diff i
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:54:20PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:27:31AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I've notice
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> what pf keyword addition?
>
Andreas asked this question in the last sentence of his email:
> Is there a key word planned for this icmp6 code which could be used in PF?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > what pf keyword addition?
> >
>
> Andreas asked this question in the last sentence of his email:
>
> > Is there a key word planned for this icmp6 code which could be u
