Sorry to break the threading, but I already expunged the original
message..
Re: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=140529530814733w=2
The second and third hunk should use mallocarray() instead of malloc()
in my eyes.
sizeof(Elf_Phdr) as type just doesnt make sense to me.
Hope not everyone is
If you look at the diff that went in already, it's using mallocarray.
It wouldn't even compile otherwise.
sprinkle malloc array in the kern directory.
Index: exec_subr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/exec_subr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -p -r1.36 exec_subr.c
--- exec_subr.c 12 Jul 2014 18:43:32 - 1.36
+++ exec_subr.c
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:14, Ted Unangst wrote:
sprinkle malloc array in the kern directory.
And some others from exec that follow a slightly different pattern.
Index: exec_elf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/exec_elf.c,v
And some others from exec that follow a slightly different pattern.
This is the pattern I have been following as well.
As for the final diff, I've been giving up on the known constant
scenario. It seems expensive.
Index: exec_script.c
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 17:52, Theo de Raadt wrote:
And some others from exec that follow a slightly different pattern.
This is the pattern I have been following as well.
As for the final diff, I've been giving up on the known constant
scenario. It seems expensive.
Meh. :) I think they
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 17:52, Theo de Raadt wrote:
And some others from exec that follow a slightly different pattern.
This is the pattern I have been following as well.
As for the final diff, I've been giving up on the known constant
scenario. It seems expensive.
Meh. :) I
