xinit(1): xdm(1) -> xenodm(1)

2017-04-21 Thread Scott Cheloha
Index: xinit.man === RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/xinit/man/xinit.man,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.3 xinit.man --- xinit.man 30 Aug 2015 13:32:02 - 1.3 +++ xinit.man 21 Apr 2017 21:51:16 - @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@

Re: xinit(1): xdm(1) -> xenodm(1)

2017-04-23 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 05:49:59PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Index: xinit.man > === > RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/xinit/man/xinit.man,v > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -u -p -r1.3 xinit.man > --- xinit.man 30 Aug 2015 13:32:02 -

Re: xinit(1): xdm(1) -> xenodm(1)

2017-04-23 Thread Scott Cheloha
> On Apr 23, 2017, at 2:44 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > [...] but note that all this text is doing is giving an example of a > window manager and, as such, it's not wrong. My thinking is that preventing stuff like $ man xdm man: No entry for xdm in the manual. where possible

Re: xinit(1): xdm(1) -> xenodm(1)

2017-04-23 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:23:14AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > > > On Apr 23, 2017, at 2:44 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > > [...] but note that all this text is doing is giving an example of a > > window manager and, as such, it's not wrong. > > My thinking is that preventing stuff like >

Re: xinit(1): xdm(1) -> xenodm(1)

2017-04-23 Thread Scott Cheloha
> well because X docs are third party, and we don't usually make local > changes to third party docs. having said that, there are exceptions, > and i know we have changed some docs (forget which) to mention > xenodm. so that's why i said i'd leave it to the X folks ;) oh. duh. maintenance burden