resent: Fast v.s classic forwarding in NetBSD 4.0(+)

2010-07-12 Thread Putrycy
Hey. Im having problems understanding relation between classic (ip_input.c) and fast (ip_flow.c) forwarding. Could anyone please explain what exactly is the difference, which mechanism is used when, and what is corelation between those two ? I'll be grateful for any response. If it's not the

Re: Fast v.s classic forwarding in NetBSD 4.0

2010-07-12 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:15:58PM +0200, Putrycy wrote: Im having problems understanding relation between classic (ip_input.c) and fast (ip_flow.c) forwarding. Could anyone please explain what exactly is the difference, which mechanism is used when, and what is corelation between those two ?

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/net/icmp

2010-07-12 Thread Antti Kantee
On Mon Jul 12 2010 at 01:51:54 +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: Anyway, the solution as usual is to work the problem from both ends (improve the server methods and the kernel drivers) and perform a meet-in-the-middle attack at the sweet spot where nothing is lost and everything is gained.

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/net/icmp

2010-07-12 Thread Jean-Yves Migeon
On 12.07.2010 16:41, Antti Kantee wrote: It's not the same thing. Correct me if I misunderstood, but I thought you want to port/adjust/whatever rumpuser to the xen hypercall interace. Since the xen hypervisor interface, as opposed to a posix process environment, is designed for hosting an OS,

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/net/icmp

2010-07-12 Thread Jean-Yves Migeon
On 12.07.2010 18:41, Antti Kantee wrote: On Mon Jul 12 2010 at 18:32:01 +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: On 12.07.2010 18:03, Antti Kantee wrote: Now, why do you expect this to not work like it does with the current style of dom0? ... aah, currently everything just goes to dom0, and now you'd