Re: RFC: device flavours

2010-07-30 Thread David Young
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:20:39AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > A small note: focusing on isa(4), legacy drivers, and their configuration > hides the real issue, which is that we need a 1:1 mapping between the normal > and the ACPI device tree. This is not optional if we ever want to make any >

Re: RFC: device flavours

2010-07-30 Thread Eduardo Horvath
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, David Young wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:20:39AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > > A small note: focusing on isa(4), legacy drivers, and their configuration > > hides the real issue, which is that we need a 1:1 mapping between the normal > > and the ACPI device tree. Th

Re: _lwp_setprivate and _lwp_makecontext

2010-07-30 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 02:28:47AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm working on Thread Locale Storage support for NetBSD and I am facing > > an interesting issue with the libpthread integration. On i386 and AMD64, > > TLS support uses the segment register %gs or %fs to load the thr

Re: _lwp_setprivate and _lwp_makecontext

2010-07-30 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 02:28:47AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > when i looked at this, i abused _REG_ESP for i386. > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2009/09/27/msg006146.html > i have no idea if other ports have unused members like this, tho. Ah, uwe explained to me that _REG_ESP != _RE