On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
Should these be changed? Are there any adverse effects from having a
wmesg longer than 8 characters?
It seems to me that the exporter of those use strncpy() (i.e.
kern/init_sysctl.c) and that the structures use
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 14:45:59 -0400, Matthew Mondor
mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net wrote:
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:05:11 +0200
Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote:
Opinions? Any interest in it? My intent is to put NetBSD specific
scripts on wiki.n.o, and provide links for more generic
On Mon Aug 09 2010 at 11:20:29 +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
It is 'error-prone, in the sense that it can raise false positives. But
when you get more familiar with it, you can either fix the cocci patch
(easy for __arraycount, I missed one of the cases... less obvious for
aprint stuff), and
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:27:38 +0300, Antti Kantee po...@cs.hut.fi wrote:
I really dislike untested wide-angle churn, especially if there is 0
measurable gain. Converting code to __arraycount is a prime example.
The only benefit of __arraycount is avoiding typing and therefore typos.
Neither of
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:38:32AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
Should these be changed? Are there any adverse effects from having a
wmesg longer than 8 characters?
It seems to me that the exporter of those
On 09.08.2010 18:45, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Mon Aug 09 2010 at 18:19:28 +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
That said, if $someone can produce a set of rules which showably find
bugs in NetBSD code and do not produce a lot of false positives, I'm
very interested in seeing nightly runs.
Alright,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
Should these be changed? Are there any adverse effects from having a
wmesg longer than 8 characters?
It seems to me that the exporter of those use strncpy() (i.e.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:38:32AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
Should these be changed? Are there any adverse effects from having a
wmesg longer than 8 characters?
It seems to me that the exporter
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:21:02 +0100
David Laight da...@l8s.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:02:51PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
Does anyone object to my going through and coming up with shorter names
(= 8 chars) for these condvars?
It is worth chcking whether they are displayed
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:42:11PM +0900, KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
Hi! Quentin,
From: Quentin Garnier c...@cubidou.net
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 15:21:18 +
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 11:17:54PM +0900, KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
All recent PC has information on PCI in ACPI.
We can
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, David Young wrote:
What kind of segment information?
Attached is a preview of information that I supply to instances of
pci(4), ppb(4), and cbb(4) through their device properties. The
information will help them manage PCI address spaces and to program
their address
Date:Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:19:28 +0200
From:Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr
Message-ID: e2568087e60b3c2943d03413cd7e5...@localhost
I agree with pooka, no code changes to existing code just to make the
code look better.
| However, I would prefer to have code
12 matches
Mail list logo
