On Tue 24 Aug 2010 at 11:10:55 -0400, der Mouse wrote:
I believe that non-contiguous netmasks actually are illegal nowadays.
Cite?
RFC 4632 (CIDR Address Strategy), section 5.1:
...which is titled Rules for Route Advertisement. (Also, 4632 is a
BCP, not a standard.)
An
I'm trying to use TIOCPKT_IOCTL, which is described in pty(4). I had
to use an undocumented ioctl, TIOCEXT, to get it to work, and it worked
differently than the manual page said it would. I've attached a patch
for the manual page, and the new manual page, for review.
All uses of TIOCPKT_IOCTL
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:40:18AM -0500, David Young wrote:
I'm trying to use TIOCPKT_IOCTL, which is described in pty(4). I had
to use an undocumented ioctl, TIOCEXT, to get it to work, and it worked
differently than the manual page said it would. I've attached a patch
for the manual page,
Hello David. If your supposition is correct, it looks to me like
things should behave the way you expect under NetBSD-4 and NetBSD-5. The
The line:
pti-pt_send = 0;
is not there under NetBSD-5 or NetBSD-4.
Have you tried your test there?
-Brian
On Sep 2, 12:06pm, David Young wrote:
}
