Fwd: USB stack vs bus_dma_tag_t

2010-10-11 Thread Radek Kujawa
I already posted following message to port-amiga, but comment on this matter from USB wizard would be appreciated. I'm mostly interested in how complete bus_dma implementation must be for USB stack to work (provided I'm not doing any real DMA transfers). - Forwarded message from Radek

Re: [ANN] Lunatik -- NetBSD kernel scripting with Lua (GSoC project results)

2010-10-11 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:45:41 -0600 Samuel Greear l...@evilcode.net wrote: I didn't like the fact that the only option for loading a script into the kernel was to load the script source. I would make loading pre-compiled scripts the preferential method. In fact, I would probably tear eval out

Re: [ANN] Lunatik -- NetBSD kernel scripting with Lua (GSoC project

2010-10-11 Thread Lourival Vieira Neto
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:32 AM, David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 07:34:43PM -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:   A signature only tells you whose neck to wring when the script   misbehaves. :-) Since a Lua script running in the kernel won't be   able

Re: [ANN] Lunatik -- NetBSD kernel scripting with Lua (GSoC project

2010-10-11 Thread David Holland
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:53:10AM -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote: A signature only tells you whose neck to wring when the script misbehaves. :-) Since a Lua script running in the kernel won't be able to forge a pointer (right?), or conjure references to methods or data that

Re: [ANN] Lunatik -- NetBSD kernel scripting with Lua (GSoC project

2010-10-11 Thread Lourival Vieira Neto
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:50 AM, David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:53:10AM -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:  A signature only tells you whose neck to wring when the script  misbehaves. :-) Since a Lua script running in the kernel won't be