Re: error adding a new system call

2011-06-17 Thread David Laight
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:08:16PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:36:43PM +0800, Charles Zhang wrote: > > Does NetBSD have a rescue mode where I can recover my system? > > If I have to re-install the system, can I install it without formatting the > > disk?(so my source

Re: error adding a new system call

2011-06-17 Thread Martin Husemann
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:36:43PM +0800, Charles Zhang wrote: > Does NetBSD have a rescue mode where I can recover my system? > If I have to re-install the system, can I install it without formatting the > disk?(so my source file is not lost) Yes, boot -sa and use /rescue/init as init, /rescue/sh

Re: error adding a new system call

2011-06-17 Thread Charles Zhang
2011/6/16 Martin Husemann > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:39:11AM +0800, Charles Zhang wrote: > >- add the syscall to the src/sys/kern/syscall.master list > > Use forward declarations in this version, like "struct whatever *" > instead of a typedef'd name, so the signature is valid all by itself

Re: Seventh Edition(V7) filesystem support.

2011-06-17 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20110617.220043.653026525707362873@vnop.net>, UCHIYAMA Yasushi wrote: >I have prepared patch for 5.99.53. >ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/uch/ v7fs-5.99.53.patch and >v7fs-5.99.53.tar.gz > >I would like to commit this. Any objection? Review welcome. > general: - functions

Re: Seventh Edition(V7) filesystem support.

2011-06-17 Thread UCHIYAMA Yasushi
I have prepared patch for 5.99.53. ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/uch/ v7fs-5.99.53.patch and v7fs-5.99.53.tar.gz I would like to commit this. Any objection? Review welcome.

Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL

2011-06-17 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:24:13PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote: > > On Jun,Thursday 16 2011, at 5:30 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > > > Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > >> I have few concerns: > >> > >> - If we enable DIAGNOSTIC, then we should also enable DEBUG, as it also > >> covers many

Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL

2011-06-17 Thread Adam Hamsik
On Jun,Thursday 16 2011, at 5:30 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: >> I have few concerns: >> >> - If we enable DIAGNOSTIC, then we should also enable DEBUG, as it also >> covers many relevant diagnostic checks. >> >> - Alternatively, it should be clearly def

nfs server lockup (again)

2011-06-17 Thread Manuel Bouyer
Hello, some time ago I reported that a NFS server, rock solid running a 5.0_STABLE kernel from february 2010, will lock up when upgraded to 5.1_STABLE. I couldn't reproduce this on a testbed but I got the opportunity to try again the faultly kernel on a production server and I can now report how it