At Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:28:49 +, David Laight wrote:
Subject: Re: getrusage() problems with user vs. system time reporting
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 04:08:13PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> >
> > So, if I understand the way SYSCALL_TIMES_PROCTIMES is implemented it
> > effectively converts
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:43:57PM -0500, David Young wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:09:27PM +, David Holland wrote:
> > > > So, a few months back we got a new improved quota format for FFS.
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > All right, I give up.
> >
> > ok, I have been asked by Imp
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:49:29AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> > Unless someone suggests a good word for "limited thing", maybe the best
> > option is to invent a term of art and *define* it to mean what you
> > want, after the manner of Humpty Dumpty. To that end I suggest
> > "quotar" or
In article <20010318.pa13ihod001...@ginseng.pulsar-zone.net>,
Matthew Mondor wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:58:27 -0400
>Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> Obligatory actual netbsd tech-kern content: It seems like we really need
>> a sync_synchronous(2) system call that guarantees that all file system
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> In article <20010318.pa13ihod001...@ginseng.pulsar-zone.net>,
> Matthew Mondor wrote:
>>On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:58:27 -0400
>>Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>>> Obligatory actual netbsd tech-kern content: It seems like we really need
>>> a sync_synchro
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:54:45AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> My man page on 5.1 matches Mathew's.
>
> But, does sync do cache flushes on all disks as well?
>
> Does SUS require this?
I believe fsync_range with FDATASYNC is required to. Note that
since it's guaranteed to sync "sufficient me
