Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > pmap_pdp_ctor() abuses pmap_kenter_pa() to change the protection of an
> > already existing mapping. According to rmind this is because on x86
> > pmap_protect() does not work for pmap_kernel().
>
> Right. I have not had a chance to look into it yet..
>
> Pl
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> did you find out which call of mutex_enter() it was?
My best suspect is pn->pn_sizemtx but I fail to see how it will not be
cleared.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:17:17 +
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Right. Patch synced with HEAD changes, if somebody enjoys debugging:
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/x86_256_cpus_v5.diff
While I do not have a physical machine with more than 32 CPUs, I do
have a vendor contact who seems will
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:24:59AM +, David Laight wrote:
> > Oh, my mistake, since there was concern about filesystem type I
> > thought you were talking about raw flash, but apparently CompactFlash
> > is not raw flash, same as USB sticks aren't.
>
> OTOH I've seen a CF card with comple
Hi,
I tried booting a Sun E3500 (sparc64) with today's current, but it dies early
with:
Loading netbsd: 8945656+559016+366344 [599208+399025]=0xdd6328
panic: uvm_km_bootstrap: could not reserve kernel kmem
This is the "uvm_map_findspace failed" ENOMEM return in uvm_map_prepare():
http://o
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:45:32AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:20:18PM +, David Holland wrote:
> > > > Is CHFS really suitable for CompactFlash? Is LFS even usable?
> > >
> > > No
> >
> > I thought the whole point of chfs was to be able to operate on raw
>
I think you mean "halves the write rate".
--- On Thu, 2/23/12, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
From: Thor Lancelot Simon
Subject: Re: Snapshots in tmpfs
To: "David Holland"
Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org
Date: Thursday, February 23, 2012, 5:04 PM
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:45:32AM +, David Holland
