On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:15 PM, David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:27:00PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>>> ENXIO seems appropriate.
>>
>> Or even better: ENOSYS.
>
> ENXIO is better, it means the requested subsystem is
> unavailable/disabled.
or ENOEXEC.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:27:00PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > ENXIO seems appropriate.
>
> Or even better: ENOSYS.
ENXIO is better, it means the requested subsystem is
unavailable/disabled.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> can't you make TTL optional without versioning OPs?
> eg. making the reply variable-sized.
Here is a first attempt:
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/kernel.patch
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/libpuffs.patch
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/libperfuse.patch
I am current