David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/.
Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6?
If it's going to be a new toplevel directory, it
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:03:03PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/.
Can we reach some consensus
Bernd Ernesti net...@lists.veego.de wrote:
(I know there's an argument that if it's /kernel we could eventually
put other stuff in there as well besides modules; but all such uses
are so far entirely conjectural (not even to the stage of being
vaporware) so I think it's highly
On 07/08/2012 04:17 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Bernd Ernesti net...@lists.veego.de wrote:
(I know there's an argument that if it's /kernel we could eventually
put other stuff in there as well besides modules; but all such uses
are so far entirely conjectural (not even to the stage of
Please not /kernel as it was already mentioned, it is too similar to
/kern.
What about /netbsd? E.g. /netbsd/6.0_BETA/{modules,kernel,firmware}.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:57:00 +0200
Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de wrote:
Please not /kernel as it was already mentioned, it is too similar to
/kern.
What about /netbsd? E.g. /netbsd/6.0_BETA/{modules,kernel,firmware}.
/netbsd/amd64/6.0/GENERIC/{modules,kernel,firmware} :) ?
But can the
On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:57:00 +0200
Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de wrote:
Please not /kernel as it was already mentioned, it is too similar to
/kern.
What about /netbsd? E.g. /netbsd/6.0_BETA/{modules,kernel,firmware}.
On 08.07.2012 16:34, Lars Heidieker wrote:
I would prefer /kernel as it most closely describes what it is. In that
move it would be nice if /netbsd and /libdata/firmware would be moved in
there as well. At least for /netbsd this would be missleading if we go
with /modules eg.
Sure that /kern
Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote:
On 08.07.2012 16:34, Lars Heidieker wrote:
I would prefer /kernel as it most closely describes what it is. In that
move it would be nice if /netbsd and /libdata/firmware would be moved in
there as well. At least for /netbsd this would be
hi,
Hi,
I am thinking to move the test for MAKEENTRY into the cache_enter(9):
http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/cache_enter.diff
Comments?
ok for me.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
--
Mindaugas
10 matches
Mail list logo