Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? If it's going to be a new toplevel directory, it

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Bernd Ernesti
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:03:03PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Bernd Ernesti net...@lists.veego.de wrote: (I know there's an argument that if it's /kernel we could eventually put other stuff in there as well besides modules; but all such uses are so far entirely conjectural (not even to the stage of being vaporware) so I think it's highly

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Lars Heidieker
On 07/08/2012 04:17 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Bernd Ernesti net...@lists.veego.de wrote: (I know there's an argument that if it's /kernel we could eventually put other stuff in there as well besides modules; but all such uses are so far entirely conjectural (not even to the stage of

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Edgar Fuß
Please not /kernel as it was already mentioned, it is too similar to /kern. What about /netbsd? E.g. /netbsd/6.0_BETA/{modules,kernel,firmware}.

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:57:00 +0200 Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de wrote: Please not /kernel as it was already mentioned, it is too similar to /kern. What about /netbsd? E.g. /netbsd/6.0_BETA/{modules,kernel,firmware}. /netbsd/amd64/6.0/GENERIC/{modules,kernel,firmware} :) ? But can the

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Matthew Mondor wrote: On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:57:00 +0200 Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de wrote: Please not /kernel as it was already mentioned, it is too similar to /kern. What about /netbsd? E.g. /netbsd/6.0_BETA/{modules,kernel,firmware}.

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Jean-Yves Migeon
On 08.07.2012 16:34, Lars Heidieker wrote: I would prefer /kernel as it most closely describes what it is. In that move it would be nice if /netbsd and /libdata/firmware would be moved in there as well. At least for /netbsd this would be missleading if we go with /modules eg. Sure that /kern

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-08 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote: On 08.07.2012 16:34, Lars Heidieker wrote: I would prefer /kernel as it most closely describes what it is. In that move it would be nice if /netbsd and /libdata/firmware would be moved in there as well. At least for /netbsd this would be

Re: cache_enter test for MAKEENTRY

2012-07-08 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
hi, Hi, I am thinking to move the test for MAKEENTRY into the cache_enter(9): http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/cache_enter.diff Comments? ok for me. YAMAMOTO Takashi -- Mindaugas