Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 benchmarks

2012-08-29 Thread Francois Tigeot
Martin Husemann wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 04:59:46PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: I get: GENERIC,v 1.348.2.1, from 2012-04-23. Can you try: config -x /netbsd | fgrep DIAGNOSTIC please? The DIAGNOSTIC option is there. -- Francois Tigeot

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 benchmarks

2012-08-29 Thread Martin Husemann
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 04:59:46PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > I get: GENERIC,v 1.348.2.1, from 2012-04-23. We switched "reproducable binary builds" on, so the binaries avoid compile time dependend infos where possible (to help binary patches). Can you try: config -x /netbsd | fgrep DIAGNOST

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 benchmarks

2012-08-29 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:19:20AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:15:21 +0200 > Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:51:43PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > > > > > > If the kernel is before 15th of August, netbsd-6 still had DIAGNOSTIC > > > opt

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 benchmarks

2012-08-29 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:15:21 +0200 Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:51:43PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > > > > If the kernel is before 15th of August, netbsd-6 still had DIAGNOSTIC > > option enabled by default, which would affect the performance. Did you > > use a

Re: Notes for building NetBSD on OS X 10.7.4

2012-08-29 Thread David Holland
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:10:05AM +0200, Adam Ciarci?ski wrote: > I strongly disagree. Clang works excellently. Here's my way to > build NetBSD (does not need command line tools being installed, > Xcode in /Applications is sufficient): > > #!/bin/csh *cough* -- David A. Holland dholl...@n