Hi,
If noone has objection, could someone commit my patches?
From: Ryo ONODERA ryo...@yk.rim.or.jp, Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:49:48 +0900
(JST)
Hi,
From: Iain Hibbert plu...@rya-online.net, Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:34:41
+0100 (BST)
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
Hi,
As
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 04:15:20PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
That's what Linux does for the most part. I don't think our current
VFS protocol is particularly amenable to making this work easily.
A first version may always implement the async calls as sync, right?
I've seen no requirement
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:07:38PM +, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
I am playing with oracle XE on 6.0_RC2 and ktrace tells me that this
requires Linux aio_* system calls.
[...]
Is there any advantage to using aio rather than regular I/O from
threads? I've used both (aio only a
Rhialto rhia...@falu.nl wrote:
That's what Linux does for the most part. I don't think our current
VFS protocol is particularly amenable to making this work easily.
A first version may always implement the async calls as sync, right?
I've seen no requirement that prohibits that.
As I
paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
On Oct 5, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
I am playing with oracle XE on 6.0_RC2 and ktrace tells me that this
requires Linux aio_* system calls.
Here is the documentation:
http://lse.sourceforge.net/io/aio.html
Abd the system
