Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:54:24 -0500 (EST)
From:Mouse
Message-ID: <201211300354.waa22...@sparkle.rodents-montreal.org>
On the general VLAn topic, I agree with all Dennis said - leave the VLAN tags
alone and just deal with them.
| > I believe every use of BPF by an
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:00:52PM +, David Laight wrote:
> > >I must look at how to determine that disks have 4k sectors and to
> > >ensure filesystesm have 4k fragments - regardless of the fs size.
> >
> > newfs should already ensure that fragment >= sector.
>
> These disks lie about
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:00:51AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> da...@l8s.co.uk (David Laight) writes:
>
> >I must look at how to determine that disks have 4k sectors and to
> >ensure filesystesm have 4k fragments - regardless of the fs size.
>
> newfs should already ensure that fragment >= s
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:19:49PM -0800, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> Hello. I've just noticed an issue where broadcast traffic on vlans
> also shows up on the parent interface. My environment is NetBSD-5.1/i386
> with the wm(4) driver. I'm not sure yet if the problem is specific to the
> wm(4)
da...@l8s.co.uk (David Laight) writes:
>I must look at how to determine that disks have 4k sectors and to
>ensure filesystesm have 4k fragments - regardless of the fs size.
newfs should already ensure that fragment >= sector.
>By the sound of it the log ought to be written in fs frag (or block)
