Re: com(4) and LSI bug workaround

2013-10-03 Thread KIYOHARA Takashi
Hi! From: Izumi Tsutsui Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:29:52 +0900 >> > First of all, your guess has no evidence and actually it seems incorrect. >> > >> > There are some articles that indicate it's a documented future: >> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/203948 >> >> Yes.

Re: com(4) and LSI bug workaround

2013-10-03 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> > Then can you revert your changes? > > Is it better to revirt right now? Why not? Your current code doesn't work as expected. You changed the original code without confirmation. Your guess was wrong and the original code looks correct. I see no reason to keep current code. > >> > Isn't it m

Re: com(4) and LSI bug workaround

2013-10-03 Thread magician
Hi! From: Izumi Tsutsui Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:11:04 +0900 >> > Then can you revert your changes? >> >> Is it better to revirt right now? > > Why not? Done. > Your current code doesn't work as expected. > You changed the original code without confirmation. > Your guess was wrong and the

Re: com(4) and LSI bug workaround

2013-10-03 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> >> > Then can you revert your changes? > >> > >> Is it better to revirt right now? > > > > Why not? > > Done. Thanks. > > Your current code doesn't work as expected. > > You changed the original code without confirmation. > > Your guess was wrong and the original code looks correct. > > hmm