Re: Enhance ptyfs to handle multiple instances.

In article <532def5e.2040...@izyk.ru>, Ilya Zykov wrote: >> The mountpoint inside ptm_pty. Perhaps by having separate instances in the >> ptm >> driver? >> >> christos >> >> > >I think, it's not better. >I can do so, but: > 1. Now we have only 2 instances ptm_pty, one for ptyfs one for bsdpty

Re: Enhance ptyfs to handle multiple instances.

> The mountpoint inside ptm_pty. Perhaps by having separate instances in the ptm > driver? > > christos > > I think, it's not better. I can do so, but: 1. Now we have only 2 instances ptm_pty, one for ptyfs one for bsdpty and use its mainly for switch from one to other(we will have ptm_pty ar

Re: Enhance ptyfs to handle multiple instances.

On Mar 22, 3:50pm, net...@izyk.ru (Ilya Zykov) wrote: -- Subject: Re: Enhance ptyfs to handle multiple instances. | > | > I don't understand why you want to get rid of the mountpoint arg inside | > the pty structure. It certainly makes things faster, and the pty can't | > be shared... | > | > c

Re: Enhance ptyfs to handle multiple instances.

> > I don't understand why you want to get rid of the mountpoint arg inside > the pty structure. It certainly makes things faster, and the pty can't > be shared... > > christos > Sorry, but I don't understand too, what structure do you mean exactly and how. Ilya.