On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:57:37PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >I also found this page that tackles the same problem on Linux:
> >http://dak1n1.com/blog/7-performance-tuning-intel-10gbe
It seems that page describe a slightly different model.
Intel 82599 datasheet is available here:
http://www.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:40:25PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> New version with some changes suggested by wiz@.
Anyone has objection to this change being committed and pulled up to
netbsd-7?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
What is your test setup? Do you have 2 identical boxes?
Does it perform better e.g. on Linux or FreeBSD? If so, you could
check how the config registers get set by that particular OS.
2014-08-28 9:26 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Dreyfus :
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:57:37PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
> Or the performance are constrained by something unrelated. In the blog
> post cited above, the poster acheived more than 5 Gb/s before touching
> MMRBC, while I am stuck at 2,7 GB/s. Any new idea welcome.
The blog post refers to PCI-X, I'm more familiar with PCIe, but the concepts
are similar.
In article <20140828072832.gi8...@homeworld.netbsd.org>,
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:40:25PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>> New version with some changes suggested by wiz@.
>
>Anyone has objection to this change being committed and pulled up to
>netbsd-7?
>
Not me.
c
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:57:37PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
I also found this page that tackles the same problem on Linux:
http://dak1n1.com/blog/7-performance-tuning-intel-10gbe
It seems that page describe a slightly different model.
Intel 82
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:37:06AM -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> Isn't your PCIe slot constrained? I thought I remembered that you're
> only getting 2.5GT/s and I forget what test you're running.
I use netperf, and I now get 2.7 Gb/s.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> As I've been reading this discussion, it seems very x86 centric.
>
> I've thinking about adding
>
> void intr_distribute(void *ih, const kcpuset_t *newset, kcpuset_t *oldset)
>
Agree. And this would be MI interface. Just as Kengo-san already
pointed out, MD may want
Terry Moore wrote:
> There are several possibilities, all revolving about differences between the
> blog poster's base system and yorus.
Do I have a way to investigate for appropriate PCI setup? Here is what
dmesg says about it:
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
pci0: i/o space, memo
I'm currently running kernel:
NetBSD slave 6.1_STABLE NetBSD 6.1_STABLE (SLAVE) #4: Fri May 23 23:42:30 EST
2014
stix@slave:/home/netbsd/netbsd-6/obj.amd64/home/netbsd/netbsd-6/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/SLAVE
amd64
Built from netbsd-6 branch synced around the build time. Over the
last year, I ha
10 matches
Mail list logo