Re: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Bert Kiers
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:24:52AM +0100, Justin Cormack wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:22:31PM -0400, Terry Moore wrote: > >> > >> Is the ixg in an expansion slot or integrated onto the main board? > > > > If you know where to g

Re: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Bert Kiers
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:11:29PM +0200, Bert Kiers wrote: > NetBSD 6.1 says: > > vendor 0x8086 product 0x1528 (ethernet network, revision 0x01) at pci1 dev 0 > function 0 not configured > > Complete messages: http://netbsd.itsx.net/hw/x9drw.dmesg > > NetBSD current from today also does not co

Re: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:11:29PM +0200, Bert Kiers wrote: > NetBSD 6.1 says: > vendor 0x8086 product 0x1528 (ethernet network, revision 0x01) at pci1 dev 0 > function 0 not configured In src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe/ we know about producct Id 0x1529 and 0x152A but not 0x1528. But this can probably be

PUFFS race on parent mtime update

2014-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hi When running regression tests on FUSE filesystems, I hit a i race condition: when I create a node in a directory, the parent directory mtime/ctime seems to be updated asynchronously, and some tests that check it report an error because it has not been updated at test time. Here is a PoC: st

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Terry Moore
> -Original Message- > From: Hisashi T Fujinaka [mailto:ht...@twofifty.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:39 > To: Terry Moore > Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org > Subject: RE: FW: ixg(4) performances > > I may be wrong in the transactions/transfers. However, I think you're > reading the pag

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Terry Moore
>From Emmanuel Dreyfus > You are right; > # pcictl /dev/pci5 read -d 0 -f 1 0xa8 > 00092810 > # pcictl /dev/pci5 write -d 0 -f 1 0xa8 0x00094810 > # pcictl /dev/pci5 read -d 0 -f 1 0xa8 > 4810 That's reassuring. The dump confirms that we're looking at the right registers, thank you. As I read

Re: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Masanobu SAITOH
On 2014/09/04 0:40, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:11:29PM +0200, Bert Kiers wrote: NetBSD 6.1 says: vendor 0x8086 product 0x1528 (ethernet network, revision 0x01) at pci1 dev 0 function 0 not configured In src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe/ we know about producct Id 0x1529 and 0x152A

Re: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Masanobu SAITOH
On 2014/09/04 11:24, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: On 2014/09/04 0:40, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:11:29PM +0200, Bert Kiers wrote: NetBSD 6.1 says: vendor 0x8086 product 0x1528 (ethernet network, revision 0x01) at pci1 dev 0 function 0 not configured In src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe