Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:31:07 -0700
From: Jeff Rizzo
I'm guessing at the moment the answer is "don't do that," but it looks
like wapbl and discard aren't playing nice together:
panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "rw_lock_held(&wl->wl_rwlock)"
Try attached patch?
Index: sys/uf
I'm guessing at the moment the answer is "don't do that," but it looks
like wapbl and discard aren't playing nice together:
panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "rw_lock_held(&wl->wl_rwlock)"
failed: file "/home/riz/src/sys/kern/vfs_wapbl.c", line 1715
Stopped in pid 0.54 (system) at netbsd:cpu_
Hi,
On 2015/07/23 19:44, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> On 2015/07/17 5:18, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>> Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
>>> There has been no objection for about 10 months...
>>> So, I am going to commit this implementation. Here is the rebased
>>>
Hi, Christos.
On 2015/08/07 18:53, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <55c349bf.2000...@execsw.org>,
> Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> Currently, pci_msi_count() and pci_msix_count() take one
>> pci_attach_args argument.
>> These functions may be used in other than attach function. So,
