On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:59:00PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Martin Husemann wrote:
> > I have another evbarm machine now hanging as well, so it is not just alpha.
>
> The sparc test runs on babylon5 are affected, too. I just committed a
> fix, let's see if it works.
Alpha worked, will
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:55 AM, David Young wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 06:23:14PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a new patch that restructures ARP caches, which
>> aims for MP-safe network stack:
>> http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/lltable-arpcache.diff
>> (https://github.com/
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Aug 25, 6:34pm, ozak...@netbsd.org (Ryota Ozaki) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Restructuring ARP cache
>
> | >
> | > | > - foo() {
> | > | > if () {
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 06:23:14PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new patch that restructures ARP caches, which
> aims for MP-safe network stack:
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/lltable-arpcache.diff
> (https://github.com/ozaki-r/netbsd-src/tree/lltable-arpcache)
I don't think tha
Nobody having an idea about DIRHASH? I´ve also seen that tmpfs has the
same regression.
I corrected 2 minor flaws in my tool, if it´s useful to somebody:
--8<-
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
struct timeval tv_sta
Martin Husemann wrote:
> I have another evbarm machine now hanging as well, so it is not just alpha.
The sparc test runs on babylon5 are affected, too. I just committed a
fix, let's see if it works.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@netbsd.org
On Aug 25, 6:34pm, ozak...@netbsd.org (Ryota Ozaki) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Restructuring ARP cache
| >
| > | > - foo() {
| > | > if () {
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > }
| > | > }
| > | > instead:
| > | > foo() {
| > | > if (!..
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Aug 24, 6:41pm, ozak...@netbsd.org (Ryota Ozaki) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Restructuring ARP cache
>
> | BTW, should I KNF the patch before committing whether they would
> | change soon?
>
> I think leave it as it is; it is a minor point
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:37:04AM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> I think I see the bug in my change, but I have no idea why only your
> alpha setup is being affected by it. I'm testing a patch on i386 now
> and if it doesn't break anything else, I will send it to you to test
> on the alpha.
Martin,
You wrote:
> This change makes my alpha reproducably wedge when doing
>
> lib/libc/ttyio/t_ttyio (272/621): 1 test cases
> ioctl:
>
> Can't break into ddb, kernel (alpha GENERIC) hard locks up.
>
> Reverting to r1.264 makes it work again.
>
> I'm not sure what is special in my alp
10 matches
Mail list logo
