Re: Preproc condition for GCC 2.x

2015-09-15 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in > sys/sys/device.h:246. We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA. Joerg

Re: New sysctl entry: proc.PID.realpath

2015-09-15 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07.09.2015 17:58, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: > Hello there, > > Le 2015-09-07 12:24, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : >> I'm here to get the support for it. At the moment it (cache nits) >> exceeds my comprehension too. >> >> Are the other bits ok? KAUTH

re: New sysctl entry: proc.PID.realpath

2015-09-15 Thread matthew green
it seems to me that the "curtain" should control access to this info like it does other process info. see: security.models.extensions.curtain security.curtain sysctl nodes. .mrg.

Re: New sysctl entry: proc.PID.realpath

2015-09-15 Thread Jean-Yves Migeon
Le 15/09/2015 23:17, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : > On 07.09.2015 17:58, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: >> Hello there, > >> Le 2015-09-07 12:24, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : >>> I'm here to get the support for it. At the moment it (cache nits) >>> exceeds my comprehension too. >>> >>> Are the other bits ok?