re: Preproc condition for GCC 2.x

2015-09-17 Thread matthew green
Michael McConville writes: > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > > > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in > > > sys/sys/device.h:246. > > > > We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA

Re: Preproc condition for GCC 2.x

2015-09-17 Thread Michael McConville
Michael McConville wrote: > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > > > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in > > > sys/sys/device.h:246. > > > > We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA.

Re: Preproc condition for GCC 2.x

2015-09-17 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18.09.2015 00:53, Michael McConville wrote: > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville >> wrote: >>> I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? >>> It's in sys/sys/device.h:246.

Re: Preproc condition for GCC 2.x

2015-09-17 Thread Michael McConville
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in > > sys/sys/device.h:246. > > We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA. Would the devs be interested in a bu