Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2016-07-14 Thread Ryota Ozaki
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: >> > >> Modified Files: >> > >> src/sys/net: route.c >> > >> src/sys/netinet: ip_flow.c >> > >> src/sys/netinet6: ip6_flow.c nd6.c > > It is specifically the route.c change, backing that one out avoids the > problem

Re: lfs_lock

2016-07-14 Thread Michael van Elst
dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) writes: >Is there any reason lfs is using a global (rather than per-volume) >lock? ad@ seems to have introduced it but as usual there's little in >the way of reasoning or explanation. After changing lfs to use the new locking primitives it was utterly

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Husemann
> > >> Modified Files: > > >> src/sys/net: route.c > > >> src/sys/netinet: ip_flow.c > > >> src/sys/netinet6: ip6_flow.c nd6.c It is specifically the route.c change, backing that one out avoids the problem for me. I would suggest this patch: Index: route.c

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread HRISHIKESH GOYAL
Hello all, I think, I have a fundamental doubt in implementing tunefs. Is the task contain only that changing a right bit in e2fs_features_compat (or e2fs_features_rocompat or e2fs_features_incompat), and the filesystem will itself take care everywhere, about the feature based on the value of

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2016-07-14 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20160714105820.ga16...@homeworld.netbsd.org>, Martin Husemann wrote: >On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:37:00AM +, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By:ozaki-r >> Date:Mon Jul 11 07:37:00 UTC 2016 >> >> Modified Files: >>

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Jul 14, 4:13pm, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote: -- Subject: Re: GSoC-2016 | On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:50:26AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > | On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > | > great, are we doing something about tunefs? | > | |

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread David Holland
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:50:26AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > | On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > | > great, are we doing something about tunefs? > | > | You mean fsck_ext2fs ? > > Tunefs so we can adjust superblock flags. Should we have a

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2016-07-14 Thread Michael
Hello, On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:22:06 +0100 Nick Hudson wrote: > On 07/14/16 11:58, Martin Husemann wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:37:00AM +, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > >> Module Name: src > >> Committed By: ozaki-r > >> Date: Mon Jul 11 07:37:00 UTC

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Jul 14, 12:10pm, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote: -- Subject: Re: GSoC-2016 | On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: | > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > > great, are we doing something about tunefs? | > | > You mean

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Jul 14, 12:09pm, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote: -- Subject: Re: GSoC-2016 | On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > great, are we doing something about tunefs? | | You mean fsck_ext2fs ? Tunefs so we can adjust superblock flags. christos

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Hudson
On 07/14/16 11:58, Martin Husemann wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:37:00AM +, Ryota Ozaki wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: ozaki-r Date: Mon Jul 11 07:37:00 UTC 2016 Modified Files: src/sys/net: route.c src/sys/netinet: ip_flow.c

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Husemann
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:37:00AM +, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: ozaki-r > Date: Mon Jul 11 07:37:00 UTC 2016 > > Modified Files: > src/sys/net: route.c > src/sys/netinet: ip_flow.c > src/sys/netinet6: ip6_flow.c nd6.c > > Log Message: >

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > great, are we doing something about tunefs? > > You mean fsck_ext2fs ? Unrelated to this gsoc: should we add ext*fs support to makefs? Martin

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Husemann
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > great, are we doing something about tunefs? You mean fsck_ext2fs ? Martin

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread HRISHIKESH GOYAL
Hello sir, FYI: 1. mid way in implementing htree directory write support. 2. I have built the htree write code. 3. I have mounted the ext4fs in write mode. 4. Currently working on fixing some issues of Htree directory write support. Regards Hrishikesh On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Christos

Re: GSoC-2016

2016-07-14 Thread Christos Zoulas
great, are we doing something about tunefs? thanks, christos > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:55 PM, HRISHIKESH GOYAL wrote: > > Hello sir, > > > FYI: > 1. mid way in implementing htree directory write support. > 2. I have built the htree write code. > 3. I have mounted