> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:21:41 +0200
> From: "J. Hannken-Illjes"
>
> Plan is to untangle the mountlist processing from vfs_busy() / vfs_unbusy()
> and add an iterator for the mountlist:
Generally seems like a good idea to me!
> - void
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 06:46:24PM +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 11:12:42AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>
> > That said, very high-latency transports like iSCSI require a lot more
> > data than we can put into flight at once. We just don't have enough
> >
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 08:54:40AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> t...@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) writes:
>
> >When SCSI tagged queueing is used properly, it is not necessary to set WCE
> >to get good write performance, and doing so is in fact harmful, since it
> >allows the drive to
t...@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) writes:
>When SCSI tagged queueing is used properly, it is not necessary to set WCE
>to get good write performance, and doing so is in fact harmful, since it
>allows the drive to return ORDERED commands as complete before any of the
>data for those or prior
2017-03-31 22:16 GMT+02:00 Thor Lancelot Simon :
> It's not obvious, but in fact ORDERED gets set for writes
> as a default, I believe -- in sd.c, I think?
>
> This confused me for some time when I last looked at it.
It confused me also, that's why I changed the code a while back