Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:04:42 +0100
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <5be4edf8-4722-e586-ea3e-0021862a4...@gmx.com>
| I was testing it on a headless desktop. Benchmarking with -j4 or -j8 in
| the background couldn't be reliable so the system was idle.
"Not reli
On 13.03.2018 09:17, Robert Elz wrote:
> Not a surprise there either - where it might make a difference is when
> the number of processes is more in the thousands. I'm not sure how
> 20-30 processes counts as a "regular running system" though, my
> laptop has > 130 processes at the minute, and it
Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2018 03:27:50 +0100
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <24955bcc-ce92-150f-75cc-60bc62287...@gmx.com>
| The approach with iterating over pid_table[] didn't work well for me and
| I've abandoned it quickly.
I am not surprised at that.
| I've bee
